Every delivery of steel, stainless steel or welding consumables should come with a document showing what has been supplied. EN 10204 defines the types of inspection document: 2.1, 2.2, 3.1 and 3.2. The 3.1 certificate is the most commonly requested document in steel construction and equipment manufacturing, while the 3.2 certificate is mainly found in pressure equipment, offshore work and projects with independent inspection.
Things still go wrong regularly: a certificate that does not match the delivery, a 2.2 where a 3.1 was required, or a heat number that disappears once the material is cut. This article explains what each type means, who signs it, when to require which type and how to maintain traceability.

EN 10204 distinguishes between non-specific and specific inspection. With non-specific inspection, results come from regular production and not necessarily from the batch delivered. With specific inspection, testing is carried out on the products supplied or on the test unit they come from.
Only 3.1 and 3.2 therefore say anything about the material actually on your shop floor.
The difference between 3.1 and 3.2 lies not in the measurements but in who confirms them. A 3.1 certificate is validated by the manufacturer's authorised inspection representative, who must be independent of the manufacturing department, in practice the quality department of the mill or producer.
A 3.2 certificate is prepared by that representative together with an external party: the purchaser's authorised inspection representative or an inspector designated by the official regulations. Think of a classification society, a notified body or an inspection agency engaged by the client. That party is involved in the testing and co-signs. A 3.2 must therefore be requested with the order; it cannot be produced afterwards.
The type required follows from the applicable standard or regulations and the client's specification:
Do not require a 3.2 by default where a 3.1 suffices. It adds cost and lead time without changing the steel.
Receiving a certificate is not the same as checking it. At goods-in, check at least:
If anything does not match, quarantine the material as non-conforming and do not use it until the issue is resolved.
A certificate only has value if you can show it belongs to the component that was built in. EN 1090-2 requires material to be traceable from receipt to handover, with stricter identification and marking requirements for EXC3 and EXC4. Batch-level traceability is often allowed unless the specification requires traceability per component.
In practice this means:
For load-bearing steel structures this also underpins CE marking. For independent review of goods-in inspection or the dossier, see welding inspection and QA/QC.
A tailored quote in a few clicks. You get an answer from a welding coordinator.
Independently assessed, demonstrably recorded
The questions we are asked most often.
A 2.2 contains results of non-specific inspection, from regular production and not necessarily from your batch. A 3.1 contains results of testing on the products supplied or their test unit, validated by an inspector of the manufacturer who is independent of production.
No. For a 3.2 the external party is involved in the testing itself, which must be agreed at the time of ordering. At most, new testing can be witnessed afterwards, resulting in a new certificate.
A stockholder or processor must pass on the producer's inspection documents unchanged, clearly linked to the material supplied. It may add its own document, for example for cut plate, but may not alter the producer's data.
For structural steel, 3.1 is the usual baseline under EN 1090-2, although a 2.2 is allowed in certain cases. Since mills almost always supply 3.1 for structural steel, it makes sense to request it as standard when ordering.
Just ask it. You get a personal answer from a welding coordinator who has done the work, not from a salesperson.
Send your request Call 06 29 72 37 91