Design & fabrication·21 January 2026·3 min read

Calculating the throat thickness of a fillet weld

Calculating the throat thickness of a fillet weld

Throat thickness is the design dimension that governs the strength of a fillet weld. Yet on the shop floor, and even on drawings, the leg length z is regularly meant where a is written, or the other way round. The difference is a factor of 1.41, enough to make a joint substantially over or under designed.

This article explains exactly what throat thickness is, how to calculate it, how it relates to leg length, and why a bigger weld is not always a better weld.

What throat thickness is

Throat thickness is the height of the largest isosceles triangle that fits within the cross section of the fillet weld, measured from the theoretical root to the weld face. Leg length z is the length of the triangle leg along the parent material.

For an equal leg fillet, a = z times 0.7 (more precisely 1 divided by the square root of 2). A fillet with z = 10 mm therefore has a throat of 7 mm. Conversely, if the calculation requires a = 5 mm, the welder must deposit a leg of roughly 7 mm.

The calculation to EN 1993-1-8

Eurocode 3 part 1-8 uses either the directional method or the simplified method. The simplified method checks the resultant force per unit length of weld against the design weld resistance, derived from the tensile strength of the parent material, a correlation factor beta-w and the partial factor.

For S235 beta-w is 0.8, for S355 it is 0.9 and for S460 it is 1.0. That means stronger steel does not proportionally allow a smaller weld: the correlation factor partly offsets the gain. In practice the required throat is therefore always calculated, never estimated.

Minimum and maximum values

There is a practical minimum: too small a weld cools so quickly that hardness and cracking risk increase, particularly on heavy material. Many specifications set a minimum throat of 3 mm, and more on heavy sections, derived from the thickness of the thinner part.

At the upper end, a fillet on thin material need not be larger than the thickness justifies. A throat above roughly 0.7 times the thinner plate thickness adds little strength while costing disproportionate weld metal, arc time and shrinkage.

Why bigger is not better

Weld metal volume increases with the square of the throat. Going from a = 4 to a = 6 mm means over twice the weld metal, so over twice the arc time, wire and heat. That heat translates directly into more shrinkage and more distortion.

A fillet routinely laid a few millimetres oversize is therefore one of the most expensive habits in a workshop. Measuring with a fillet gauge and holding the specified size saves material and straightening. See controlling weld distortion.

Frequently asked questions

Under ISO 2553 the dimension is preceded by a for throat or z for leg length. If only a number appears without a letter, check with the designer; assuming it is a can leave the joint undersized by a factor of 1.41.

Structurally that is almost always stronger, but it costs more weld metal, more preparation and more shrinkage, and it changes the examination requirements. Only do so in consultation with the designer, because full penetration can have unexpected consequences in the calculation.

With a fillet gauge that follows the convex or concave profile. Note that a concave fillet has a smaller actual throat than a flat one with the same leg length, and that on a convex weld the extra material above the theoretical triangle does not count.

Only if the deep penetration is demonstrated by procedure qualification and the standard permits it. EN 1090-2 and EN 1993-1-8 allow for this, but the penetration must be demonstrable and repeatable, which requires evidence per procedure.

Have a welding or QA/QC question?

Ask the DEHAAS Welding & Quality Assistant, have your case reviewed by a specialist, or call us directly.

WhatsApp